ClearView compensates over 200 clients for poor advice
Dealer group ClearView Financial Advice has offered over $730,000 in compensation to more than 200 clients who received poor life insurance advice.
The compensation to 215 clients who were under ClearView followed a review and remediation program, according to ASIC.
Under this program, ClearView reviewed 4,269 advice files from 279 of its advisers and remediated clients who had suffered loss, with 215 clients offered $730,138 in financial compensation and 21 clients received non-financial remediation through reissued advice documents and fee disclosure.
ASIC said it first identified issues of non-compliant advice by ClearView’s representatives during an industry-wide review of retail life insurance in 2014.
“A sample review of ClearView’s advice files highlighted broad areas of concern such as inadequate needs analysis for client, insufficient explanation about the pros and cons of using superannuation to fund insurance premiums, inadequate consideration of premium affordability issues and poor disclosure about replacement products,” ASIC said.
ASIC said it raised these issues as well as some concerns related to the conduct of Jason Churchill, one of ClearView’s advisers at the time.
In 2016, ASIC accepted an enforceable undertaking (EU) from Mr Churchill for failure to meet his obligations as a financial adviser.
Under the EU, Mr Churchill agreed to undergo additional training, adhere to strict supervision requirements and have each piece of advice audited by his authorising licensee before it was provided to clients.
Separately, ClearView undertook to review advice previously provided by Mr Churchill and remediated clients who had received inappropriate advice.
ASIC also noted that ClearView began a review of the personal insurance advice provided by its advisers to determine if there was a systemic issue related to the broad areas of concern identified by ASIC and engaged Deloitte to provide independent oversight.
The review found that a number of ClearView’s advisers did not undertake adequate “needs analysis” for clients.
“The needs analysis is a critical part of the financial advice process. It enables advisers to understand their clients’ financial situation, needs and objectives, and provides the basis for the financial advice,” ASIC said.
“To identify all instances of this issue and to remediate any adversely affected clients, ClearView undertook a full review and remediation program in accordance with Regulatory Guide 256: Client review and remediation conducted by advice licensees (RG 256).”
ASIC said Deloitte oversaw the review and remediation program to ensure that it was conducted in accordance with the principles set out in RG 256.
Wealth management investigations up 216%
ASIC has revealed a 216 per cent increase in the amount of wealth management inv...
FASEA guide ‘above the current law’: AFA
The recent guidance from the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Association ...
Hayne fallout may deter advisers from IOOF
The reputation hit from IOOF’s appearance at the Hayne royal commission may ma...