Since risk specialist advisers are different from general financial planners, they should adhere to a different set of education standards from those proposed within the government's draft legislation, argues Synchron.
In response to the draft bill unveiled earlier this month, director of the risk specialist dealer group, Don Trapnell, said because risk advisers are specialists, they need a unique education stream tailored specifically to life insurance and which recognises existing knowledge and experience.
"Financial advisers should be able to elect to study a specialist stream, just as students of any discipline can choose to specialise in a particular area," Mr Trapnell said.
"In the case of risk specialists, this would of course mean specialising in life insurance."
Mr Trapnell added that existing advisers with experience over the long-term should be provided with an appropriate education pathway which recognises that experience as well as their knowledge of life insurance and their "unique set of client relationship skills".
"The average age of Synchron advisers is 43. These people understand what they need to do in order to meet changing education requirements," he said.
"But we need to also ensure that older, highly-experienced advisers are provided with an appropriate professional pathway that recognises their extensive knowledge, experience and expertise so they can continue to provide the intricate insurance advice and deep emotional support their clients need."
The government's draft states that an independent, industry-established body – set to begin operating on 1 July 2016 – will develop the new standards and the transition pathway for current advisers.
Provisions of those details will come into effect by July 2017, and existing advisers will have until July 2019 to complete any further study, pass a one-off exam and subscribe to a new code of ethics.
The draft bill is available for public consultation until 4 January 2016.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE IFA DAILY BULLETIN
- 24 Oct 2018Queensland man charged over 'false' AFSL documentsBy Reporter
- 24 Oct 2018Accountants compromised by FASEA standardsBy Jotham Lian
- 24 Oct 2018Robo-advice register aims to bridge client service gapBy Adrian Flores
- 23 Oct 2018Platform provider remains ahead of the packBy Eliot Hastie
- 23 Oct 2018Wentworth loss opens Coalition to FASEA changesBy James Mitchell
- 22 Oct 2018ASIC reveals findings of CBA enforceable undertakingBy Adrian Flores
- view all