Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
  • subs-bellGet the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
Advertisement

‘Spread costs as widely as possible’: SMSF Association backs CSLR special levy review

The association has thrown its support behind the consultation, urging Financial Services Minster Daniel Mulino to choose a method for allocating the excess funds that would “reduce the burden on any one individual sector”.

Speaking at the SMSF Association’s Technical Summit in Sydney on Wednesday, chief executive Peter Burgess backed the minister’s decision to consult with industry on potential options for implementing a special levy for the $47.3 million beyond the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR) subsector cap.

“The association acknowledges the importance of such a scheme, but to reduce the burden on any one individual sector, we encourage Treasury and the Minister to explore ways of spreading the costs as widely as possible,” Burgess said.

He added that the association endorsed the statement by Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) deputy chief ombudsman June Smith, who had recently noted that “we are well beyond black swan events and bad apples and we need to look at these systemic issues across the industry and prevent them from happening in the first place – it’s not enough to have a CLSR at the end when the harm has occurred”.

Mulino announced that he asked Treasury to consult on the statutory options available to deal with the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR) 2025–26 revised claims, fees and costs estimate.

At the start of July, the CSLR operator released the FY25–26 revised levy estimate, which lowered the amount attributable to the financial advice subsector to $67.3 million.

Along with the announcement, the CSLR notified Minister Mulino of the need for a special levy of $47.3 million.

 
 

At a high level, the options include spreading the compensation payable by the CSLR over a longer period of time, applying a special levy to the subsector that has exceeded the cap, or applying a special levy across additional subsectors.

Importantly, as the consultation paper noted, the minister’s “power to exercise these options is discretionary” and there are no requirements for a particular action and, indeed, no time frame for the minister to make the decision.

Burgess also stressed that the “root cause” of the ballooning costs through the CSLR – along with the surge of advice and SMSF complaints to AFCA – is conflicted advice models and inappropriate advice.

The 95 per cent increase in SMSF complaints in 2024-25 is down to these issues, not the SMSF structure itself, he added.

“While it may be very tempting for some to jump to the conclusion that SMSFs are the problem, that’s simply not the case,” Burgess said.

“These statistics, as well as the ballooning cost of Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR) levies, again highlight the importance of having a well-resourced regulator who can detect and act quickly on any signs of advice failure.”