The Full Federal Court has overturned a 20-year ban against James Mawhinney, which was initially implemented to restrain him from advertising investments and raising funds from the public through financial products.
Mayfair managing director, Mr Mawhinney, earned the ban last year after the Federal Court found that he showed “no contrition or remorse” for his part in a scheme that allegedly cost its investors hundreds of millions. The case resulted from an ASIC proceeding against Mayfair 101 in August 2020.
The Federal Court said at the time that James Mawhinney acted with “total disregard” for the Corporations Act and ASIC Act, and that his contraventions are “of a very serious kind and warrant a very substantial period of restraint”.
Mr Mawhinney appealed this decision, which was allowed by the Full Court on Thursday, on the ground that he was denied procedural fairness.
Calling the case “very exceptional”, the court ordered that the corporate regulator’s application for injunctions against Mr Mawhinney be remitted to the Federal Court for another hearing.
Pending the final determination, the Full Court has reinstated the interim injunctions made in August 2020, which restrain Mr Mawhinney and any company of which he is an officer or shareholder, from receiving or soliciting funds in connection with any financial product; advertising or promoting any financial product; and removing from Australia any assets acquired with funds received in connection with any financial product.
Commenting on the court’s decision, ASIC deputy chair, Sarah Court, said that the corporate regulator would “carefully consider today’s judgment and evaluate our next steps”.
“ASIC took this case to protect the public from the risk of significant financial harm arising from what we believed to be serious misconduct. Mayfair, under Mr Mawhinney’s direction, marketed high-risk products as low risk. Almost 500 people invested in the Mayfair 101 group and they are still owed a total of approximately $211 million,” Ms Court said.
Responding the court’s latest decision, Mayfair released a statement on Thursday quoting Mr Mawhinney.
“I am grateful that the court has upheld our appeal on the basis of a denial of procedural fairness,” said Mr Mawhinney.
“This is a significant step forward for our noteholders who have had their lives turned upside down by ASIC’s misguided enforcement actions.”
Moreover, he expressed concern with the fact that the matter has been remitted to the lower court, giving ASIC a second chance to run a new case.
“We have begun preparing an application for special leave to the High Court. In the meantime, we have 570 investors who have been left out of pocket by a regulator who brought a case which the court found untenable.”
Also commenting on Thursday, managing partner of Roberts Gray Lawyers, Rhys Roberts said: “This judgement is testament to the fact that ASIC’s case was flawed”.
“Our grounds of appeal to the High Court are already in the process of being prepared. We are committed to clearing Mr Mawhinney’s name from this horrific situation and productively engaging with policymakers in due course to avoid disasters like this happening again.”
I so agree with all comments below. ASIC went for an easy target back in early 2020 to flex their muscles to justify their existence. They claim it was necessary to protect the public, yet at the same time were happy to freeze Mayfair accounts & steam roll all existing mum and dad investors in their plight. Then fine Mawhinney $30 mil to boot. Why have our governments allowed their corporate watchdog to behave like this and destroy lives.?
It was my understanding that the reason the investors are out of pocket is due to ASIC suspending the business and essentially freezing assets including investors’ money?
ASIC went in like a bull in a china shop which undoubtedly caused financial harm.
I don’t like the smell of the Mayfair setup but this was not the way to handle them.
No need to worry. ASIC will simply use the money they take from all the other good advisers to keep fighting the case. However if they can’t win a case like this it proves how truly incompetent they are.
Surely Mawhinney was no worse than the big banks and AMP yet ASIC hasn’t banned them