X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

ASIC slaps restrictions on CFD providers

The corporate regulator has used its product intervention powers to impose conditions on the distribution of contracts for difference (CFDs) to retail clients.

by Reporter
October 26, 2020
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ASIC said it had intervened in the products by reducing the degree of leverage that could be offered to retail investors within a CFD.

From 29 March 2021, ASIC said retail clients could only be offered a maximum gearing ratio of 30:1 for CFDs referencing an exchange rate for a major currency pair, 20:1 for CFDs referencing an exchange rate for a minor currency pair, gold or major stock market index, and 10:1 for CFDs referencing a commodity other than gold or a minor stock market index.

X

Further, retail investors would be restricted to leverage ratios of 2:1 for CFDs referencing crypto-assets and 5:1 for CFDs referencing shares or other assets.

ASIC would also implement further restrictions to standardise CFD providers’ margin close-out arrangements, limit retail clients’ CFD losses and prohibit offering inducements to clients to invest in CFDs.

The regulator said the changes would strengthen protections for retail clients after ASIC investigations found they were likely to lose money from investing in CFDs.

“During a volatile five-week period in March and April 2020, the retail clients of a sample of 13 CFD issuers made a net loss of more than $774 million,” ASIC said.

“During this period, over 1.1 million CFD positions were terminated under margin close-out arrangements, compared with 9.3 million over the full year of 2018; [and] more than 15,000 retail client CFD trading accounts fell into negative balance owing a total of $10.9 million (compared with 41,000 accounts owing $33 million over the full year of 2018).”

ASIC commissioner Cathie Armour said the heavy losses highlighted the need for stronger CFD protections through the product intervention order, which would remain in place for 18 months.

Related Posts

Top 5 ifa stories of 2025

by Alex Driscoll
December 23, 2025
0

Here are the top five stories of 2025.   ASIC turns up heat on Venture Egg boss over $1.2bn fund collapse...

Image: Nathan Fradley

Regulatory ‘limbo’ set to continue in 2026, but positives remain

by Keith Ford
December 23, 2025
0

Wrapping up 2025 and looking forward to the next 12 months, Nathan Fradley from Fradley Advice explained why he’s positive...

First Guardian fallout continues for Diversa with APRA action

by Adrian Suljanovic
December 23, 2025
0

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has imposed new licence conditions on Diversa Trustees to address concerns about its investment...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Innovation through strategy-led guidance: Q&A with Sheshan Wickramage

What does innovation in the advice profession mean to you?  The advice profession is going through significant change and challenge, and naturally...

by Alex Driscoll
December 23, 2025
Promoted Content

Seasonal changes seem more volatile

We move through economic cycles much like we do the seasons. Like preparing for changes in temperature by carrying an...

by VanEck
December 10, 2025
Promoted Content

Mortgage-backed securities offering the home advantage

Domestic credit spreads have tightened markedly since US Liberation Day on 2 April, buoyed by US trade deal announcements between...

by VanEck
December 3, 2025
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited