X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Federal Court upholds ASIC appeal over banned adviser

The Federal Court has set aside the decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal not to ban a financial adviser after finding the AAT has interpreted the Corporations Act too narrowly.

by Staff Writer
July 17, 2020
in News
Reading Time: 1 min read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Federal Court has set aside the decision of the AAT not to ban financial adviser Robert Hutchison following an appeal from ASIC. The AAT ruled that Mr Hutchison breached his contractual obligations with his licensee – RI Advice Group – by not passing on the money he received directly from his clients to RI Advice.

However, the AAT found that sections of the Corporations Act prohibiting dishonest, misleading and deceptive conduct did not apply to this conduct because it related only to the agreement between Mr Hutchison and RI Advice, not the service being provided to clients.

X

“The Court disagreed, confirming the broad scope of these prohibitions,” ASIC said in a statement. “The Court confirmed that an indirect connection between a person’s dishonest or misleading conduct and a financial product or service is sufficient for the prohibitions to apply.”

The matter has been remitted back to the AAT to have the matter re-determined.

Mr Hutchison was permanently banned from providing financial services on 11 June 2017.

Related Posts

How mapping client emotions can transform apprehension into trust

by Keith Ford
November 11, 2025
0

Clients undergo a range of emotional responses throughout the advice process and, according to new financial adviser-led research, advisers’ ability...

Iress launches business efficiency program for FY26

by Olivia Grace-Curran
November 11, 2025
0

The financial services software firm said its renewed focus on core platforms, technology investment and client engagement reflects a leaner,...

Regulator updates guidance for exchange-traded products

by Shy-ann Arkinstall
November 11, 2025
0

ASIC has released a new regulatory guide for exchange-traded products that consolidates previous guidance as the ETF market undergoes significant...

Comments 15

  1. Anonymous says:
    5 years ago

    Sounds like fraud so you can’t really argue. Now to do the same to the large licensees.

    Reply
  2. Yip totally destroyed 3 years says:
    5 years ago

    [quote=Frustrated]what a joke, ASIC has probably ruined this guy and his family just so it isn’t seen as a bad loss to the public. He was given a lifetime ban which was overturned by the AAT who took a full week to understand the case and reverse the banning. No wonder so many advisers are leaving the industry[/quote][quote=Frustrated]what a joke, ASIC has probably ruined this guy and his family just so it isn’t seen as a bad loss to the public. He was given a lifetime ban which was overturned by the AAT who took a full week to understand the case and reverse the banning. No wonder so many advisers are leaving the industry[/quote]

    Reply
  3. This poor was set up by dishon says:
    5 years ago

    [quote=dr doolittle]true story. i was aware of an GP who had swiped medicare cards at an average of 1 every 30 secs. obviously he was taking the system to the cleaners however all he received was a caution. [/quote][quote=dr doolittle]true story. i was aware of an GP who had swiped medicare cards at an average of 1 every 30 secs. obviously he was taking the system to the cleaners however all he received was a caution. [/quote]

    Reply
  4. Robert says:
    5 years ago

    What a JOKE! So this guy withheld payments from his Licensee – Yes this is dishonest.
    BUT, what about AMP and other product providers withholding Grand Fathered commission payments from Advisers prior to the date legislated being 1 Jan 2021???????

    Reply
  5. Bob says:
    5 years ago

    Read the case details before jumping into the conclusion. He banked clients cheque directly to personal bank account then charge them again at platform. He misled or deceived his clients by
    failing to disclose to them that they had been double charged advice fees and failed to comply with the proper process for remitting and reporting the fees.

    Reply
  6. Amanda says:
    5 years ago

    Yet some advisers get done for bad advice and fraud and get 3 year bans

    Reply
  7. Dave says:
    5 years ago

    So Advisers are being banned for the choices they make in business activities that don’t necessarily affect the best interests of their clients, or client-outcomes? What’s next – ASIC banning Advisers for their choices of meat vs vegetarian, or suits vs casual, Apple vs PC?

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      5 years ago

      Spot on no fraud or anyone hurt here

      Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      5 years ago

      meat, suits, pc’s, 150 lashes, skinny cappucino, android, mazda, broncos, supreme, folder, grower, beatles – that’s me

      Reply
  8. Matt says:
    5 years ago

    So AMP breaching BOLR contractual agreements can also trigger a Corporations Act contravention prohibiting dishonest, misleading and deceptive conduct? The contractual agreement just needs an indirect connection to a financial product. Shame no one from licensee land ever gets banned though.

    Reply
  9. Stewart says:
    5 years ago

    Clearly a dodgy adviser not deserving of being in the industry regardless of the indirect client connection to the issue of paying his licensee.

    Reply
    • Simon says:
      5 years ago

      Absolutely correct. His activity , indirect or not, goes to the integrity of the industry and all advisers.

      Reply
  10. Frustrated says:
    5 years ago

    what a joke, ASIC has probably ruined this guy and his family just so it isn’t seen as a bad loss to the public. He was given a lifetime ban which was overturned by the AAT who took a full week to understand the case and reverse the banning. No wonder so many advisers are leaving the industry

    Reply
  11. Dr Mike Burry says:
    5 years ago

    Doctors do not get permanently banned for ripping off the Medicare system. This industry is ridiculous.

    Reply
    • dr doolittle says:
      5 years ago

      true story. i was aware of an GP who had swiped medicare cards at an average of 1 every 30 secs. obviously he was taking the system to the cleaners however all he received was a caution.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited