School banking programs are schemes where a bank has a relationship with a school to offer deposit products to students.
The programs encourage children to establish bank accounts and make ongoing deposits into the accounts at school, with volunteers including parents and staff collecting, processing and banking the money on the behalf of students.
Around 60 per cent of Australian primary schools participate in banking programs, ASIC research has found, but the regulator has questioned the long-term effect on students’ finances.
“There is limited evidence among past students that school banking programs have a lasting impact on their saving behaviour,” a new ASIC report noted.
The corporate watchdog has also reported that school banking increases the chances of a participating student remaining with the authorised deposit taking institution that provided the program when they progress into adulthood.
However, non-participating students were also said to be likely to remain with the same ADI they banked with as a child.
As it is, ASIC does not directly regulate the programs, but it does police the deposit accounts involved.
The school banking volunteers, including staff and parents, are not required to hold an Australian financial services licence or be authorised by an AFS licensee.
The regulator is seeking to better understand how the programs are implemented, how they are marketed to school communities, the types of accounts established through the schemes while children are in school and in later years.
Community opinions from members of the public and organisations will help inform development of high-level principles on the implementation of school banking, ASIC said.
The review is expected to be complete early next year.
“A thinly veiled marketing program to turn our kids into customers for life”
Consumer group CHOICE has scrutinised Commonwealth Bank’s offering in particular, Dollarmites.
Jonathan Brown, CHOICE consumer advocate, said if CBA cared about education, the economy would be in a different state.
“Commonwealth Bank’s Dollarmites program is a thinly veiled marketing program to turn our kids into customers for life,” Mr Brown said.
“ASIC’s new research shows that these bank marketing programs have little evidence they work – if Commonwealth Bank really cared about education we would have a whole generation of Australians feeling secure and financially sound. Instead we’ve got some of the highest household debt in the world.”
He added CHOICE had heard from disgruntled parents who were “fed up” with having their children being targeted.
“Commonwealth Bank [is] relying on nostalgia and memories of toys and cartoon characters to avoid scrutiny,” Mr Brown said.
“It’s vital that every Australian parent who is worried about corporations in our schools speaks up.”
ASIC commissioner Sean Hughes commented financial literacy is and needs to be embedded in the Australian curriculum with there being a long history of banking programs in schools.
“Young people are engaging with money every day and they need to understand financial concepts and develop the skills to identify financial services that are right for them,” Mr Hughes said.
“It is important for ASIC to understand the range and extent of impacts that school banking programs can have on students, parents and school communities, as part of our responsibility to ensure the financial sector is delivering for all Australians, and especially for future generations of future consumers.”
The regulator reported it has already consulted with a range of stakeholders including primary school principals, parents, present and past students and education and consumer advocacy groups, as well as the banks offering the programs.
I agree with the two comments above. Choice is having an idiocy moment here. Combank, or any bank, that involves itself in helping kids get a habit for saving is a great organization. I’m no fan of Combank, to be sure, but what they are doing is to be heralded not shot down. If bloody ASIC would encourage financial literacy in schools instead of some of the half-witted things they choose to do with our tax dollars then kids, and Australia, would be miles better off. I had a Dollarmites at school and I changed to Westpac at about age 21. It is rubbish that you are ”snared for life” – what lunacy to say that. It patronizes people and kids! How dare they! Choice are talking through their corporate hats yet again. They REALLY must be hard up against it for decent stories these days. Lord, save us form the clueless ASIC and CHOICE, please!
I was introduced to Dollarmites when I started primary school in the late 1970’s and CBA are no longer my main bank, and haven’t been since my teen years. Parental preferences are more likely to hold sway here.
There’s no indoctrination, but regular savings patterns were established. And huge thank you’s to the parents and volunteers over the years who’ve helped out with the processing.
If anything, more needs to be done to increase financial literacy in primary schools. The big banks may not be the best to provide this, but they do have the resources.
Interesting that the regulator is becoming involved in this. Where to next I wonder!?
I’m not a big fan of banks, especially Commbank but CHOICE are being idiots here. Commbank encourage kids to save, the kids get a better interest rate than ordinary savers, the schools get a cut and Commbank gets long term customers. Good marketing and a win win for all. All CHOICE will do is stop a good thing for the kids and schools.