The inaugural State of Wealth report by Crestone Wealth Management and CoreData has found that high–net-worth individuals favour their own advice when it comes to investing.
The report found that 20 per cent of individuals did not use any form of financial advice and 50.5 per cent did things themselves and just sought confirmation from either professionals or other information sources.
Only 20.5 per cent of respondents relied on a trusted professional to help them deal with their investments.
This had a flow on effect in not only their portfolio construction but also in the plans they had for the future and in wealth succession.
The report classified high–net-worth individuals as those with over $1 million in assets outside of super or primary residence and ultra-high–net-worth as those with over $10 million.
Simon Hoyle, head of market insight at Coredata, said most of these individuals fell into a category they called coach seekers, those that sought validation.
“More than half of respondents can be classified as coach seekers, they are seeking validation on the decisions they are making but would seek professional help to make those decisions,” he said.
Mr Hoyle said that the single biggest circumstance that would trigger individuals to use a financial adviser was if they found one they could trust.
“The relativity low uptake of financial advisers in this cohort is a surprise but the barriers to taking up advice are around trust. The issue of trust flows through to how individuals seek advice or whether they perceive value in the services they provide,” he said.
However, it resulted in the advisers having unsophisticated portfolios and left them open to risk, said Mr Hoyle.
“We have a cohort of investors who are poorly diversified and therefore are exposed to a greater level of risk within their portfolios,” he said.
“They are reluctant to seek professional advice and they are not high users of professional advice, which is why they find themselves in the situation they are in.”
Head of strategy and development at Crestone Wealth Management, Clark Morgan, said most of the respondents had very concentrated investments and this exposed them to risk.
“These individuals invest in three asset classes; Australian equity, cash and property, all heavily correlated, very concentrated and Australian domestic equities is a very small subset of global equities where you can get that diversification,” he said.
Eighty-one per cent held cash, while 56.4 per cent held Australian equities and 41.6 per cent held properties, making them the three biggest asset classes by quite a margin.
Mr Morgan said that not only did these individuals need education to construct their portfolios, but would soon need help with the complex task of wealth transfer.
“There are issues, like what to do with succession, do I want to leave a legacy or just leave what’s left over, that the wealthy are aware of but they’re not tackling,” he said.
This report was constructed to help advisers to answer that question and help advisers approach investors, said Mr Morgan.
“There is a need for the providers of financial services to understand what the target market wants, not only in terms of trust and competence in their advisers but a degree of independence,” said Mr Morgan.
“And it’s a matter of creating a forum to dealing with the broader issues around next generation and succession.”
Maybe that’s why they are rich , not paying very expensive fees to FP’s . Dont worry , someone will try to roll them into there SMSF ‘s and own products , or maybe they don’t like RObo advice , or planners that have nothing telling a wealthy individual to have life insurance , or diverse away from property . MLC only recommends 4% Property !!!!! go figure
Obviously the person who said : Why would any HNW and definitely UHNW person seek advice from someone who is less financially successful than them? Thinks that Jeff Bezos is the only person who can give qualified financial advice
In choosing an adviser early questions have to be What is your net worth? What is your portfolio? How has it performed at certain times? Why would any HNW and definitely UHNW person seek advice from someone who is less financially successful than them? And further, if a person has accumulated wealth that meets or exceeds their goals using their own methods why would they listen to all the standard diversification and ” I can do better for you” pitches? An adviser’s real add is more around technical and legislative advice rather than portfolio advice and then only as a part of the investors advice team of professionals.
Most Hi net individuals obtain advice from their Accountant. One visiting BDM asked me if we had a stock broker working in our Accounting firm and I said no that’s the Accountant talking to a client. Pretty easy to give out stock tips and talk the market and make a few recommendations when you end your sentence with “of course Bob this is just us having a chat, it’s your choice but I reckon you’d be mad to do XYZ and you need at least XYZ invested in shares”… Wealthy individuals are not shunning advice, they’re 1) not going to see advisers because it’s compulsory for them to get their tax return completed by an Accountant and the Accountant is giving them investment tips and 2) they’re not getting a wheel barrow of consumer protection documents, like SoA’s so they think they’re making their own decisions.
Quick FPA, bring out a $1500 online module and training course to fix this.
Who here believes in a meritocracy anyway when you can just inherit mum and dads wealth and live a life of instagram luxury.
And they fail to get wills drawn up, as an example. Most narcissists know it all (even when they don’t). But their narcissism ensure they will succeed in investing regardless, until the ex takes them to the cleaners.
Not a problem….Captain Dante to the rescue with the new FPA planner dating app. Beam my up Scotty.