X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

CPA CEO went rogue on AFSL board appointments

Ousted former CPA Australia chief executive Alex Malley did not comply with internal procedures in appointing board members of the association’s troubled financial advice arm.

by Staff Writer
September 15, 2017
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Yesterday, ifa reported that the independent panel reviewing governance and remuneration issues at CPA Australia has confirmed financial losses and performance shortfalls in the professional association’s independent financial advice subsidiary.

The report also reveals that controversial former CEO Alex Malley, who publicly launched the CPA Australia Advice business alongside ASIC chairman Greg Medcraft, seized personal control over the process of appointing board directors to the AFSL.

X

At a CPA Australia board meeting in February 2015, Mr Malley – who was also chief executive of CPA Australia Advice  – personally recommended candidates for appointment to the advice arm’s board, according to minutes of the meeting.

The board then approved the appointment and remuneration of Mr Malley’s five recommended candidates, a number of whom were existing members of the board, including then-CPA president Graeme Wade, who received an additional $100,000 to serve as chair of the advice arm.

According to CPA’s reviewers, this process was out of step with the association’s own internal procedure for appointing board members.

“CPA Advice board appointment and remuneration did not follow the same procedure as CPA Australia,” the report stated. “Some members raised queries regarding the appointment of directors, especially the lack of clarity around the candidates for selection.”

The report said that it is “not unusual” for directors to be paid additional fees to sit on the boards of subsidiaries, but added that usually additional remuneration is reserved for “office-holders”.

Related Posts

Image: FAAA

FAAA wants auditors in the spotlight over Shield, First Guardian failures

by Keith Ford
December 12, 2025
1

Speaking on a Financial Advice Association Australia (FAAA) webinar on Thursday, chief executive Sarah Abood said she was pleased to...

Expect a 2026 surge in self-licencing: MDS

by Alex Driscoll
December 12, 2025
0

The dominant story of 2025 in the advice world has undoubtably been ASIC’s suing of InterPrac due to the failure...

image: feng/stock.adobe.com

Adviser movement surges as year-end licensee switching accelerates

by Shy Ann Arkinstall
December 12, 2025
0

According to Padua Wealth Data’s latest weekly analysis, there was a net gain of five advisers in the week ending...

Comments 7

  1. Anonymous says:
    8 years ago

    Medcraft was a pathetic joke, obviously his bias and weakness of character is now becoming clear in aspects such as this and the truth that LIF was built on no substantiated research. Love for one of his underlings to start dishing out the dirt as no one can be that incompetent and not make intelligent subordinates get frustrated…

    Reply
  2. Anton Boreckyi MFP CFP DFP says:
    8 years ago

    What now Mr Medcraft?

    Reply
    • Medcraft for CPAA CEO says:
      8 years ago

      Maybe Mr Medcraft should take over as CEO of CPA Advisers as he is such a strong advocate.

      Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    8 years ago

    I personally worked with one of the board members for over 5 years when he was an Accountant in practice. He did not believe in Financial Planning, in fact he actively disparaged advice and told his clients not to waste their money on getting advice, whilst also handing out his own version of unlicensed advice (e.g. cheapest super fund is best). Great person to put on the board to get a financial planning arm up and running!

    Reply
  4. The Naked Commentator says:
    8 years ago

    Well that’s the financial services industry folks! Do the wrong thing and get a massive severance payout!

    Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    8 years ago

    There is a lesson here for board members of any business or professional body. Directors must not, cannot, let a CEO assume powers they do not constitutionally hold. Reputation is lost easily, but hard to recover. The price for a well run company is eternal vigilance by the elected board, which selects the CEO and is therefore responsible for the CEOs decisions. Board members cannot take their eye off the ball, seduced by spin and bling from a CEO. I think that any person who occupies a Board position must undergo a companies directors course as a minimum.

    Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    8 years ago

    Peak of Professionalism right there!!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Seasonal changes seem more volatile

We move through economic cycles much like we do the seasons. Like preparing for changes in temperature by carrying an...

by VanEck
December 10, 2025
Promoted Content

Mortgage-backed securities offering the home advantage

Domestic credit spreads have tightened markedly since US Liberation Day on 2 April, buoyed by US trade deal announcements between...

by VanEck
December 3, 2025
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited