CPA Australia has confirmed that its application to the PSC for a new professional standards scheme, to succeed the current one that expires on 7 October this year, cannot be made in time for some CPA practitioner members to avoid a lapse in their scheme’s continuity.
The scheme covers 6,963 members who have a CPA Public Practice Certificate and provides members with an additional layer of security for the firm’s clients, with limitation of liability for the provision of certain services.
Speaking to ifa sister title Accountants Daily, PSC chief executive Deen Sanders said he is “deeply concerned” for members and their clients in the wake of potentially lapsing liability cover.
Central to the problems with the application are conflicts of interest arising from the establishment and structure of CPA Australia Advice.
The significant corporate governance and leadership issues that have since surfaced are also informing this process, Mr Sanders said.
“The organisation, at this moment in time, does not have a formally appointed chief executive, it does not have a formally complete board and it is undergoing a governance review,” Mr Sanders said.
“So in order for a professional standards scheme to be properly considered, those are obviously elements that we need to have much better clarity over.”
The conflicts created by CPA Australia Advice came to the attention of the PSC when the subsidiary was launched, and Mr Sanders said the PSC has been “in dialogue” with CPA Australia about it since then.
The PSC has made recommendations to CPA Australia that they cannot disclose, which range from minor to substantial in magnitude.
The advice arm is a sitting duck. The sooner it is amputated the better it is for CPA’s. One wonders if it was just a strategy to skirt the remuneration limits for Directors? Since when did a wholly owned subsidiary need 5 Directors? I bet CPA will not reimburse the 6,963 practitioners who will now have to go out an up their insurance cover to $5mil or more.
I hear Malley is cashed-up and looking for a new job. I suggest he buys CPA Advice and runs it as a separate, non related entity. He would rescue the beleaguered CPAs, and he can earn an income from the profit, which he believes will eventuate 🙂
The advice arm must have a separate PI and leave the rest to having status quo remain.
The Naked CEO