The corporate regulator has said it found potentially conflicted incentive structures in place at two life insurers that relate to the number of claims that are declined.
Earlier this week, ASIC released the findings of its industry-wide claims handling review, which was launched in response to the CommInsure scandal.
The review found that some insurers had substantially higher-than-average declined claims rates and a substantially higher-than-proportionate share of disputes about claims. One insurer had a denied claim rate of 37 per cent on its total and permanent disability products, 19 percentage points above the average rate.
Appearing before the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics this morning, ASIC senior executive leader Michael Saadat said two life insurers were found to be remunerating their staff using a “balance scorecard” that included incentives related to the number claims denied.
Mr Saadat declined to name the two insurers using incentives, saying ASIC received the information based on confidentiality.
He said, however, he does not expect these structures to continue.
“In the future, no insurer will have these kinds of incentive structures in their incentive plan. The life insurance code of conduct released on Tuesday - one of the elements of that code is that insurers are required to remove any incentives that relate to the number of claims declined,” he said.
“We expect that the two insurers that did have that issue will not have that issue going forward.”
Also during the inquiry, committee chair Liberal MP David Coleman asked ASIC where the rules stand in relation to banning managers in instances of adviser misconduct.
“It seems to me that there is an issue here where individuals, say financial planners, who are found to have breached rules are dealt with but senior management, who haven’t actually provided the advice, frankly seem to have not suffered substantial consequences,” Mr Coleman said.
ASIC chairman Greg Medcraft agreed with this statement, adding it was raised in the Financial Systems Inquiry report last year and that progress was being made.
“It’s often not just a problem with bad apples. It’s often a problem with the tree, so let’s deal with the tree. That is being addressed,” Mr Medcraft said.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE IFA DAILY BULLETIN
- 15 Nov 2018We’ll lose advisers through FASEA but it’s necessaryBy Adrian Flores
- 15 Nov 2018ASIC flexes its muscles at independent advisersBy James Mitchell
- 15 Nov 2018FPA hands down $50,000 fine on Sam HendersonBy Adrian Flores
- 15 Nov 2018Adviser reviews critical to client retentionBy Adrian Flores
- 14 Nov 2018ASIC bans financial services representativeBy Eliot Hastie
- 14 Nov 2018Fintech should make advice ‘enjoyable’By Adrian Flores
- view all