The number of FOS determinations concerning life insurance advice in the past year has been low, and not indicative of an industry issue, incoming FPA chief executive Dante De Gori has said.
Speaking at the FPA Professionals Congress in Brisbane yesterday, Mr De Gori said he and his team had sifted through FOS data recently to ascertain the current quality of life insurance advice.
"We all saw the ASIC report that was released, but what is happening? Are consumers complaining about the advice we're providing?" he said.
Of the 17 FOS determinations since January 2014, only two were decided in favour of the consumer. Another two determinations were neutral while the rest were in favour of the adviser.
"That, in my view, doesn't send alarm bells," Mr De Gori said, "but of course, some may argue that consumers aren't aware or understand whether the advice is any good because there hasn't been any detrimental effect in respect to any loss at the time."
Mr De Gori examined some of the top reasons why advisers were being questioned, including a lack of policy comparison and the cost of insurance products.
"We talk a lot about comparing superannuation funds when we're doing super switching, which is very important, but we don't talk a lot about comparing insurance products," he said.
"We might do a cost comparison of one or two years, but what's the cost comparison over a more sustainable time?"
Those learnings form part of the FPA's new Life Insurance Guide, which was launched to FPA members in October.
The guide offers several principles for how to use the FPA Code of Professional Practice with risk advice, including tips on recommending products and on continuing to deliver service after the insurance advice is implemented.
Mr De Gori said the guide was created to help train advisers and improve competency, which are not addressed in some of the proposed reforms in the Life Insurance Framework.
"Changing the commission model, in my view, doesn't make the adviser more competent than they were before the commission model was changed," he said.
"It doesn't improve the training standard and it doesn't deliver on the final objective, which of course is giving quality advice to Australians.
"So the FPA then has decided and developed a life insurance advice guide. It's not a rule, it's not a standard – it's a guide."
SUBSCRIBE TO THE IFA DAILY BULLETIN
- 15 Nov 2018We’ll lose advisers through FASEA but it’s necessaryBy Adrian Flores
- 15 Nov 2018ASIC flexes its muscles at independent advisersBy James Mitchell
- 15 Nov 2018FPA hands down $50,000 fine on Sam HendersonBy Adrian Flores
- 15 Nov 2018Adviser reviews critical to client retentionBy Adrian Flores
- 14 Nov 2018ASIC bans financial services representativeBy Eliot Hastie
- 14 Nov 2018Fintech should make advice ‘enjoyable’By Adrian Flores
- view all