Once a number of taxes and fees are factored in, advisers who take commissions on life insurance actually take home a lot less than the amount initially perceived, according to Life Insurance Direct.
Research conducted by the life insurance comparison company – based on an analysis of 3,000 policies across 10 life insurers – shows that while an adviser might write based on a 120 per cent commission model, they will not actually get the entire value of the commission.
For example, Life Insurance Direct said a 120 per cent commission paid by the insurer includes GST, which is paid to the ATO, not to the adviser.
"Life insurers generally don't pay commissions on frequency loadings (6-9 per cent), policy fees ($5.61 – $8.82 / month) or stamp duty (0-10 per cent) but these are included in the mythical '120 per cent' cited by these companies," a statement from Life Insurance Direct said.
"Excluding these elements means the average commission received for the policy implementation is closer to 89.83 per cent."
Life Insurance Direct chief executive Russell Cain said understanding the true amount that advisers take home will indicate what the proposed life insurance framework will mean for advisers.
This prompts questions about how much consumers should be paying for life insurance, he said.
"Reforms that ultimately reduce competition may have a significant negative impact on consumers," Mr Cain said.
"Unfortunately, the empirical data and intuitive tools available from lifeinsurancedirect.com.au indicate that the interests of consumers may not be served at all well by the reforms."
SUBSCRIBE TO THE IFA DAILY BULLETIN
- 20 Sep 2018Banned Perth adviser did not engage in dishonest conductBy James Mitchell
- 20 Sep 2018‘No advisers have been mistreated’: DalyBy James Mitchell
- 20 Sep 2018Beacon advisers held ‘ransom’ while IIOF money remains missingBy James Mitchell
- 19 Sep 2018Linchpin funded advice business in liquidationBy James Mitchell
- 20 Sep 2018Government beefs up ASIC capabilitiesBy Adrian Flores
- 20 Sep 2018Labor super gender gap proposals meet FSC approvalBy Adrian Flores
- view all