The Governance Institute has lodged a submission with Treasury calling for the introduction of an “opt out” mechanism for financial advice clients.
The institute – an industry association representing chartered secretaries, risk management professionals and governance advisers – has opposed the government’s proposed amendments to FOFA, including the removal of the ‘opt in’ requirement.
“Removing the ‘opt in’ requirement gives the adviser full control over the advising relationship while the consumer has no power at all to assess if the ongoing arrangement suits them,” said Governance Institute chief executive Tim Sheehy.
However, anticipating that the removal of 'opt in' may become a political reality, the institute has recommended a substitute requirement.
“If the ‘opt in’ rule is abolished, the government should at least consider replacing it with a less onerous alternative whereby clients are allowed to ‘opt out’ of the relationship when the fee arrangements are disclosed in their periodic renewal notices,” Mr Sheehy said.
“Disclosure at renewal time is already required, so the small step of adding an ‘opt out’ mechanism would not be a compliance burden.”
Mr Sheehy added that the best interests duty ‘catch all’ provision should be retained but amended to ensure financial advisers are protected against “unreasonable claims”.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE IFA DAILY BULLETIN
- 20 Sep 2018Banned Perth adviser did not engage in dishonest conductBy James Mitchell
- 20 Sep 2018‘No advisers have been mistreated’: DalyBy James Mitchell
- 20 Sep 2018Beacon advisers held ‘ransom’ while IIOF money remains missingBy James Mitchell
- 19 Sep 2018Linchpin funded advice business in liquidationBy James Mitchell
- 20 Sep 2018Government beefs up ASIC capabilitiesBy Adrian Flores
- 20 Sep 2018Labor super gender gap proposals meet FSC approvalBy Adrian Flores
- view all