Former advisers of collapsed dealer group AAA Financial Intelligence will not be receiving their full claims for outstanding commission payments, the company’s liquidator has revealed.
Bradley Tonks of Lawler Partners, the liquidator appointed to AAAFI and related entities, has confirmed that a number of aggrieved former authorised representatives are still seeking brokerage and commissions payments owed to them by their former licensee, as reported by ifa this week.
Mr Tonks said that the $900,000 figure identified by some former advisers as the total claims value for outstanding commissions was only a preliminary estimate and no longer realistic.
“I think this is probably overstated and we are anticipating that claims for outstanding commissions will be in the order of half a million dollars, perhaps a little more,” he told ifa.
But despite the smaller-than-previously-thought claims value, Mr Tonks also confirmed that aggrieved advisers will not be receiving the full amount claimed.
“We currently hold around $170,000 in funds, so if there is $500,000 in claims then obviously we will be in a position where we will have to adjudicate those claims,” he said.
At the same time, the liquidator called on former authorised representatives to respond to recent correspondence regarding their claims, indicating some hope of advisers seeking redress.
“We do hold funds – albeit limited – and we hope to be in a position to make distributions in the near future,” he said.
A communication to creditors from Mr Tonks, obtained by ifa, revealed that the former directors of the company explained the reasons for the collapse in a report to the liquidator in March.
The report as to affairs (RATA) of the company’s financial position singled out “rogue advisers within the AAA Shares business [an entity wholly owned by AAA FI] engaging in products that were not on the approved product list” and subsequent legal and insurance premium costs.
However, Mr Tonks stressed that much of the “rogue advice” at AAAFI occurred five or six years ago and that therefore the collapse does not necessarily reflect the behaviour of the directors who oversaw the company at the time of the licence cancellation or authorised representatives operating under the banner at that time.
“But there are some important questions that still need to be answered,” he added.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE IFA DAILY BULLETIN
16 Feb 2018Compliance engagement low with rating agenciesBy Jessica Yun
16 Feb 2018Hub24 responds to ASIC allegationsBy Killian Plastow
16 Feb 2018ASIC flags changes to adviser registerBy Killian Plastow
16 Feb 2018Former adviser excluded from industry under ASIC EUBy Staff Reporter
15 Feb 2018FASEA CEO defends professional designationsBy Killian Plastow
15 Feb 2018Synchron names new NSW managerBy Staff Reporter
- view all