X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Government welcomes feedback on ASIC funding model

The federal government is seeking stakeholder views on the ASIC funding model.

by Reporter
September 29, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The government has released a discussion paper after commencing the review of the ASIC industry funding model (IFM) in August.

Stakeholder feedback received through this process is set to inform the review’s consideration, including to consider whether any refinements are required to the IFM to ensure its settings remain appropriate.

X

The IFM was introduced in 2017, prior to which the corporate regulator was mainly funded by taxpayers.

The IFM comprises industry levies charged annually to entities across 52 industry sub-sectors, and fees-for-service charged to individual entities at the point of initiating certain regulatory services.

As part of the review, the government is welcoming feedback on the changes in levy amounts since the commencement of the IFM, among other things.

The government has found that since the commencement of the IFM, the amount recovered through levies has increased by $77.5 million or 33 per cent (as at 2020–21).

In particular, the government is seeking feedback from advisers on the possible creation of two sub-sectors (rather than the existing four) in the financial advice sector — with one sub-sector for licensees that provide personal advice to retail clients on relevant financial products and one sub-sector for licensees that do not provide personal advice.

Another method proposed by the review is the allocation of costs at a sector level (rather than sub-sector level) and the apportion of costs amongst entities using a generalised metric such as a volume-based proxy.

The government is also opening the floor up for debate by asking stakeholders whether there are other opportunities to simplify the design, structure and legislative framework for levies.

Moreover, questions relating to volatility in levies between different years include: “Is it more important to have less volatile/more stable levy amounts year-on-year, or more granular and equitable apportionment of costs each year?”; and “Are there other ways to manage or reduce volatility in levy amounts year-on-year, including other approaches to spreading costs? If so, why, and what benefits would it provide?”.

The current model was the subject of significant criticism from advice and accounting industry associations after the corporate regulator last year announced that levy costs for the 2020 financial year were set to rise by more than 60 per cent on earlier estimates.

Former treasurer Josh Frydenberg later announced “temporary and targeted relief” after ASIC’s 2020–21 Cost Recovery Implementation Statement estimated a per adviser levy of $3,138.

The government is welcoming feedback until 28 October 2022.

Related Posts

Image: Viola Private Wealth

‘Super excited’: Why Charlie Viola has high hopes for 2026

by Keith Ford
December 30, 2025
0

Wrapping up the last year and looking ahead to 2026, Viola was full of optimism for the direction of both...

The year ahead needs to see ‘sensible reform’

by Keith Ford
December 30, 2025
0

The Compensation Scheme of Last Resort getting more wide-ranging focus was a key development for advice last year, while both...

Best songs about wealth management

by Alex Driscoll
December 30, 2025
0

Music about money is abundant, however music that specifically deals with issues financial advisers deal with daily are few and far...

Comments 2

  1. Waste of Money says:
    3 years ago

    …and ASIC’s loss in court to CFSIL/CBA ‘proudly’ funded by individual advisers…

    Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    3 years ago

    Any commentary on how the levy will be offset by any settlements obtained through ASIC’s actions? Didn’t think so, the con is still on.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Innovation through strategy-led guidance: Q&A with Sheshan Wickramage

What does innovation in the advice profession mean to you?  The advice profession is going through significant change and challenge, and naturally...

by Alex Driscoll
December 23, 2025
Promoted Content

Seasonal changes seem more volatile

We move through economic cycles much like we do the seasons. Like preparing for changes in temperature by carrying an...

by VanEck
December 10, 2025
Promoted Content

Mortgage-backed securities offering the home advantage

Domestic credit spreads have tightened markedly since US Liberation Day on 2 April, buoyed by US trade deal announcements between...

by VanEck
December 3, 2025
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2026 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2026 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited