Board chair and ipac founder Paul Clitheroe spoke at an event yesterday celebrating the launch of a partnership between platform provider Netwealth and Banqer – a financial literacy coaching tool for students.
Mr Clitheroe discussed current financial literacy initiatives for schools as well as the challenges facing the government in terms of funding, and shot down claims that not enough is being done.
“If you get an adviser telling you ‘why aren’t we doing more in the schooling system?’ would you please say: ‘50 per cent of schools are engaged with ASIC’s MoneySmart, thousands of teachers are trained, the national curriculum now has financial literacy as a key statement of learning’,” he said.
“Last year, whilst we went backwards in maths and English, we came third in the world for financial literacy.
“There is an absolute bucketload going on. Any adviser or any group who wants to get involved – we’re thrilled – all we can do is set policy, and plough the field and hope people like Banqer come along and plant the seed and people like Netwealth will come along to help them grow.”
In response to the issue of advisers teaching financial literacy programs to students and despite some positive examples of adviser-teacher collaboration, Mr Clitheroe said he has seen too many cases where that strategy ensues chaos.
“Advisers are not the best people to be teaching students about financial literacy. Teachers are open to collaborating with advisers but what we have found is that when they enter a classroom, chaos ensues as they don’t know how to teach kids properly. So often teachers are interested in collaborating with advisers but do not want them in their classrooms,” he said.
“At times I see these people saying ‘not enough is being done, more needs to be done’ – we are doing tonnes. Would we like to do more? Yes, we would.”
According to Mr Clitheroe the best way to coach kids in financial literacy is to educate the teachers first.
However, there are some obstacles such as the difficulties involved in asking the Australian government, which is running budget deficits, to invest more money into the nation’s financial literacy strategy.
“Why is there only 50 per cent of schools engaged with ASICs Money Smart Teachers Program? Why is it that only 6,000 teachers are trained? Money,” Mr Clitheroe said.
“We have trouble competing for government money to train teachers – which is fair enough. If you multiply 360,000 odd teachers by $1,000 for the teacher and another $800 which we must pay the school who needs to come up with a replacement teacher – you’re talking hundreds of millions of dollars in training.
“At the end of the day we’re running budget deficits. So going along and asking for $100 million to get along with this quickly is nonsensical and it ain’t gonna happen.”
Mr Clitheroe said moving forward, the government will be focusing on policy and making room for people, initiatives and companies like Banqer to get involved.
“It’s not our job to spend taxpayer money on it and we don’t want to – we simply want to set the policy field and encourage the subject matter,” he said.
“I am here to endorse any legitimate financial literacy teaching – we need many participants.”
Mr Clitheroe said because the curriculum is already too crowded, there is no chance financial literacy will ever be taught as a stand-alone subject under curriculum, instead the key is weaving elements of financial literacy into the existing curriculum.
“Teachers are incredibly stretched. Guess who else wants its own subject: obesity, the environment – all really important issues,” he said.
The next time someone accuses us as a profession, that is “selfish” and “self serving”, remember that as a profession, many of us have offered our services to teach financial literacy for free. Every time, we try to change the perception of us , there is always someone, including so called allied services in fund managers or banks or government institutions ready to kick us. if you keep kicking a dog, one day it won’t be there or it will bite you. When poverty becomes generational, in years to come, will some expert say’ There should be a profession that helps people, plan for retirement, invest wisely, and insure themselves for catastrophies in their lives, whatever happened to those people?’ Its just easy to kick professional people to gain sympathy or votes, because of the sins of a small few in the profession. Like a great song once said “you don’t know what you’ve got until it’s gone
I find it amusing that we came third in the world for financial literacy, yet people can’t read a fund manager statement setting out fees and we have Opt in and FDS.
Clitheroe sounds like a fool here. Of course, why would advisers know anything teaching financial literacy? It’s not like part of their job is to engage with clients and educate them.
I think Paul is referencing the teaching of [b]children[/b] specifically.
I have taught both children in the classroom (I have a B.Teach) and adults in the workplace (in fin serv), and have also observed many others do the same. Some people are naturals, and others require more practice and guidance — a bit like learning any skill.
For example, I was great at working 1-to-1 with kids. I ran a successful maths/language tutoring business. But in a classroom of 25 kids, it took a long time for me to be even able to control a class — particularly one that was unknown to me. And that was after 3 years of teaching real lessons in schools almost every week throughout my degree.
It’s not an insult if teachers say, “let me do the teaching”. It’s about making best use of the skill-sets available. And as Paul said, teachers are interested in collaborating. Work together, and everyone wins.
You should tell that story to some accountants who want to do financial planning..