ASIC unveils draft regulation on robo-advice

Staff Reporter / March 22, 2016 / 0 Comments

ASIC has released a draft regulatory guide and consultation paper on robo-advice, outlining issues unique to the industry and emphasising AFSLs' responsibility to monitor their algorithms.

In a statement, the corporate regulator said it is seeking feedback on the proposals made in the paper, which include applying organisational competence obligations to robo-advisers and requiring AFSLs to monitor and test the algorithms underpinning digital advice.

The proposals address issues that those who provide digital advice to retail clients need to consider – from licensing through to the provision of advice.

ASIC commissioner John Price said: "ASIC is committed to helping industry take advantage of the opportunities offered by robo-advice, while ensuring that investor and financial consumer trust and confidence are not compromised."

Mr Price added: "We see digital advice as having the potential to offer Australian consumers access to good quality, low-cost financial advice. We encourage industry and other stakeholders to take part in this consultation process."

ASIC indicated that the draft guidance was prompted by engagement with digital advice providers about their business models.

"It became clear that digital advice providers would benefit from additional ASIC guidance specific to digital advice," the statement said.

In the statement, ASIC also made its definition of robo-advice clear: "Digital advice (also known as 'robo-advice' or 'automated advice') is the provision of automated financial product advice using algorithms and technology and without the direct involvement of a human adviser."

The deadline for submissions is 16 May, with the final guide to be released in August.


promoted stories
On 2016-03-23T03:39:18 Rob said

I think there needs to be a FUM limit to protect the ignorant.

ASIC unveils draft regulation on robo-advice

On 2016-03-22T16:44:32 Michael Baragwanath said

How about some draft regulation for the practices that have removed conflict from their business? We&#039ve had special solutions for superfunds to provide intrafund advice. If an adviser collects no volume payments, charges only flat fees and charges those fees by annual agreement is there really the need to load them with the same compliance obligations? It&#039s time for ASIC to provide compliance relief to the practices who exceed requirements so we can collectively reduce the cost of advice and help more people.
If you want to improve professionalism do it with a price signal. Make it cheaper to provide conflict free advice and watch the market move towards better client outcomes.

ASIC unveils draft regulation on robo-advice