Australians intolerant of 'unethical' banks

Almost 50 per cent of Australians would change banks if they found that their bank was behaving unethically, according to a national survey by Oxfam Australia.

In a report titled Still banking on land grabs, it was found that 75 per cent of respondents are against banks providing loans to companies that behave in an unethical manner.

Oxfam Australia chief executive Helen Szoke said the report provided new evidence that ANZ, Commonwealth Bank, National Australia Bank and Westpac have been connected with companies that operate unethically.

The report argued the big four have been connected to companies with operations in Cambodia, Brazil and Indonesia that have been involved in illegal logging, forced evictions, inadequate compensation and child labour.

"Our research shows Australians care about how their money is invested. If most people knew that their money could be used to back companies that take land and homes away from people in some of the world's poorest countries, they'd be shocked," Ms Szoke said.

"Australians hold a huge, and very direct, stake in the financial sector's choices in how it uses our money — at home and overseas," she said.

Ms Szoke urged Australia's banks to take a zero tolerance approach to unethical behaviour.

"This includes being transparent about their links to agriculture land deals, committing to increased due diligence, advocating responsible financing and supporting justice for affected communities."

In addition, the report found that 80 per cent of Australians polled believe banks that have had investments that harm a community should provide compensation.

Oxfam Australia criticised CBA and ANZ, indicating that both have done little to address "land grab" issues. NAB and Westpac, according to the report, have developed policies on land-related issues.

Add comment

Security code

Feature Video

Latest Blogs


Key budget changes for businesses

Peter Bembrick: Small businesses in particular should benefit from these changes, which include: Company tax rate reduction Over the next decade, the company tax rate will be reduced to...More >>

Robo-advice – it’s not about us

Duncan McPherson: Sadly, it appears that the vast majority of comments are from a developer's or competitor's perspective, with very few focusing on the customer. My concern was...More >>

Regime change: Why advice rules must be unified

Philippa Sheehan: I think most of us can agree that for all its foibles, the AFSL regime is a vast improvement on all previous attempts to regulate...More >>

Latest Comments