FPA slams account-based pension amendments

The Financial Planning Association has criticised amendments to the Social Security Act that would see account-based pensions deemed to be financial investments.

In a letter to the Minister for Social Services, seen by ifa, the FPA has requested an inquiry into the new Bill, arguing that the proposed changes will discourage those approaching retirement from structuring their retirement savings prudently.

The FPA’s general manager, policy and government relations, Dante De Gori, said in the letter that the changes may cause unforeseen changes to the way people spend and invest their retirement savings.

“This approach may encourage irresponsible spending, or a deleteriously risk-averse attitude to retirement savings, and in either case retirees will continue to rely on the Age Pension – perhaps to an even greater extent than they would on an account-based pension,” Mr De Gori said.

Mr De Gori also argued that the new Bill will disproportionally affect Australians with modest means as they will be caught by the new income deeming provisions, whereas those with larger accounts will be caught by the asset provisions anyway and therefore be unaffected.

The government has suggested the changes will net $161.7 million in savings to the federal Budget.

The FPA, however, does not believe such savings are possible, but rather that people will still rely on the age pension to the same extent – or perhaps more.

Mr De Gori explained that the proposed amendments will encourage retirees to pursue other investments which will not be caught by the deeming provisions, or worse, will encourage them to spend their superannuation in order to increase their age pension entitlements.

“In either case, the Bill will negatively impact the retirement outcomes and investment decisions of Australian pensioners,” he said.

Add comment

Security code


+1 #3 RussellD 2013-12-10 12:28
All good points by Dante De Gori. If brought in, the changes will cause many retirees to cash in their super thus abandoning growth assets, investing their funds in cash, experiencing a drop in their asset values and then calling on income support earlier (and more) than they perhaps would have in the past. This is yet another attempt by our government to discourage Australians from funding and accommodating their retirement. And all for what? A lousy $161.7M. I hazard a guess that it will cost the government more in the long term.
+1 #2 Jason 2013-12-10 06:33
This was legislation drafted originally by the ALP, which is surprising it took the FPA a week to respond
+1 #1 Richie Parsons 2013-12-09 10:10
Great points by Dante & the FPA. This is a short term cash grab by the government & the enabling of another Labor party "on The Run" policy for superannuation. What happened to the "No Surprises" Government who weren't going to change any super rules...???

Feature Video

Latest Blogs


A matter of trust

Spiro Paule, Findex Group:  Over the past decade there has been much discussion about issue of trust in financial services on a global basis. It is quite remarkable that...More >>

Beware the bandwagon

Mark Nagle: There is a long list of challenges facing the financial services industry in Australia and it isn’t my intention to provide an exhaustive list but...More >>

Aligning your interests is simple

Daniel Brammall, IFAAA:   Combined, the two reports, which weigh in at over 450 pages, deliver nearly 60 recommendations to address the problems with Australia’s financial system. The majority of...More >>

Latest Comments

  • Asteron reveals Trowbridge position

    Lawrence, I assume that if moving to a dialled in fee as proposed by Asteron that opt-in and FDS would become relevant as it is similar to an asset ...
    26 May 13:33  
  • Asteron reveals Trowbridge position

    The wholesale option is an interesting approach and one that should receive more than a cursory look. Too many advisers have had risk as an ancillary service ...
    26 May 13:07  
  • A matter of trust

    Yawn - the last man standing of integrity speaks again. Nauseating.
    26 May 11:37