FPA slams account-based pension amendments

Written by Richard Mayo Monday, 09 December 2013

The Financial Planning Association has criticised amendments to the Social Security Act that would see account-based pensions deemed to be financial investments.

In a letter to the Minister for Social Services, seen by ifa, the FPA has requested an inquiry into the new Bill, arguing that the proposed changes will discourage those approaching retirement from structuring their retirement savings prudently.

The FPA’s general manager, policy and government relations, Dante De Gori, said in the letter that the changes may cause unforeseen changes to the way people spend and invest their retirement savings.

“This approach may encourage irresponsible spending, or a deleteriously risk-averse attitude to retirement savings, and in either case retirees will continue to rely on the Age Pension – perhaps to an even greater extent than they would on an account-based pension,” Mr De Gori said.

Mr De Gori also argued that the new Bill will disproportionally affect Australians with modest means as they will be caught by the new income deeming provisions, whereas those with larger accounts will be caught by the asset provisions anyway and therefore be unaffected.

The government has suggested the changes will net $161.7 million in savings to the federal Budget.

The FPA, however, does not believe such savings are possible, but rather that people will still rely on the age pension to the same extent – or perhaps more.

Mr De Gori explained that the proposed amendments will encourage retirees to pursue other investments which will not be caught by the deeming provisions, or worse, will encourage them to spend their superannuation in order to increase their age pension entitlements.

“In either case, the Bill will negatively impact the retirement outcomes and investment decisions of Australian pensioners,” he said.

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Comments   

 
+1 #3 RussellD 2013-12-10 12:28
All good points by Dante De Gori. If brought in, the changes will cause many retirees to cash in their super thus abandoning growth assets, investing their funds in cash, experiencing a drop in their asset values and then calling on income support earlier (and more) than they perhaps would have in the past. This is yet another attempt by our government to discourage Australians from funding and accommodating their retirement. And all for what? A lousy $161.7M. I hazard a guess that it will cost the government more in the long term.
Quote
 
 
+1 #2 Jason 2013-12-10 06:33
This was legislation drafted originally by the ALP, which is surprising it took the FPA a week to respond
Quote
 
 
+1 #1 Richie Parsons 2013-12-09 10:10
Great points by Dante & the FPA. This is a short term cash grab by the government & the enabling of another Labor party "on The Run" policy for superannuation. What happened to the "No Surprises" Government who weren't going to change any super rules...???
Quote
 

Feature Video

Latest Blogs

how-responsive-is-your-business-ecosystem1

How responsive is your business ecosystem?

Annick Donat, BT Financial Group: How responsive is your business ecosystem?  Well firstly, how do you define it?  One way to define it is a biological community of interacting organisms...More >>
delivering-financial-advice-to-women

Delivering financial advice to women

TAL: When couples visit a financial planner the male partner, particularly when it is also a male adviser, is often the most engaged and in some...More >>
becoming-more-responsible

Becoming more responsible

George Lucas, Instreet Investment: In 1992, when compulsory superannuation was introduced, it seemed everyone was in accord with its objectives. Australia would get a universal retirement system with the...More >>

Latest Comments

  • Govt releases adviser register details

    Hopefully, this outcome will result in transparency ongoing. Where in the past, Banks/Instituti ons, have been pushing product hiding behind branded ...
    25 Oct 16:14  
  • Cbus boss under fire over union leaks

    Steve, if true, that is a lame excuse for Unions using private personal information to pursue the members funds. The ATO is responsible for collecting ...
    25 Oct 09:41  
  • CBA escapes royal commission threat

    This is the "Pink Batts" issue of our industry but Abbott would only have his mates in the frame for this one...
    25 Oct 02:52