FPA welcomes Senate recommendations in MIS report

The FPA has welcomed the recommendations made in the Senate Economics References Committee's final report on failed forestry managed investment schemes (MISs), saying it highlights the need for a clear distinction between advice and product sales.

In a statement, FPA chief executive Dante De Gori said: "The FPA recognises that thousands of Australian investors suffered when the agribusiness investment schemes collapsed. Unfortunately, many investors did not fully understand what they were buying, and believed that they had been recommended an investment which took into account their personal circumstances, when this wasn't in fact the case.

"Agribusiness MIS are highly complex products. Indeed, many FPA members have said they are so difficult to understand and justify that financial planners avoid them, and their licensees do not include them on their approved product lists. That's why the distinction between product sales and financial advice must be made clear," he said.

Mr De Gori added that the reform of agribusiness MIS should be part of a "wider, comprehensive" reform of the Australian financial services system.

"The FOFA reforms are a positive step, but the fact is that many of the product failures and consumer losses associated with agribusiness MIS are the consequence of inadequate leadership in responding to the financialisation of Australian society," he said.

In addition, Mr De Gori said the FPA has been working with the government, regulators and the industry to improve the standards of advice provided to consumers.

These include its higher levels of planner education, guiding financial planners on delivering best practice advice, and initiatives to improve consumers' financial literacy.

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Comments   

 
0 #2 Adam P 2016-03-18 12:30
There is no doubt advisers and accountants should not have recommended these rubbish MIS products.
Thankfully for our clients we never have.

But when will the FPA, ASIC, etc stop blaming the Advisers for everything.
These MIS products should never have been approved by ASIC, never received good ratings from ratings houses and if this was the case, could never have been recommended by advisers or accountants.
Quote
 
 
+1 #1 Adam P 2016-03-18 12:30
There is no doubt advisers and accountants should not have recommended these rubbish MIS products.
Thankfully for our clients we never have.

But when will the FPA, ASIC, etc stop blaming the Advisers for everything.
These MIS products should never have been approved by ASIC, never received good ratings from ratings houses and if this was the case, could never have been recommended by advisers or accountants.
Quote
 

Feature Video

Latest Blogs

key-budget-changes-for-businesses

Key budget changes for businesses

Peter Bembrick: Small businesses in particular should benefit from these changes, which include: Company tax rate reduction Over the next decade, the company tax rate will be reduced to...More >>
robo-advice-it-s-not-about-us

Robo-advice – it’s not about us

Duncan McPherson: Sadly, it appears that the vast majority of comments are from a developer's or competitor's perspective, with very few focusing on the customer. My concern was...More >>
regime-change-why-advice-rules-must-be-unified

Regime change: Why advice rules must be unified

Philippa Sheehan: I think most of us can agree that for all its foibles, the AFSL regime is a vast improvement on all previous attempts to regulate...More >>

Latest Comments